Solargraf vs SolarGenix
Solargraf Maturity
Stage 2 | Established SMB
Primary Stage Stage 2: Established teams (5-15 projects/mo). Focus: Lead management & consistency. VS
SolarGenix Maturity
Stage 2 | Established SMB
Primary Stage Stage 2: Established teams (5-15 projects/mo). Focus: Lead management & consistency. ✦ Strategic Success Analysis
The Solargraf Moat
Choose SolarGraf over standalone design tools if you require a fully integrated Enphase-native design experience with high-conversion consumer proposals. Its deep hardware-software synergy is unmatched for residential installers.
The SolarGenix Moat
Choose SolarGenix over Aurora Solar if your bottleneck is Design Speed. While Aurora remains the gold standard for high-complexity manual engineering, SolarGenix is the winner for high-velocity residential teams who need to move from 'Lead' to 'Permit' in the same day.
Operational Friction: Switching from Solargraf to SolarGenix requires adjusting CAD-level shading accuracy tolerances and recalibrating NBT ROI modeling for NEM 3.0 compliance.
This analysis is part of our 2026 Design Strategy Review.
VS
Blueprint Pick
DesignFinance
Solargraf
✓ Updated: March 2026 Site ↗
Pricing: Starting at $129/user/month
Key Features
- Rapid 3D solar design
- Integrated financing and credit checks
- Customizable sales proposals
- Automatic shading analysis
- E-signature and contract management
Pros
- One of the fastest proposal tools on the market
- Very easy for sales reps to learn
- Great integration with Enphase products
Cons
- Limited advanced engineering features
- Reporting isn't as robust as Aurora
- Support can be slow during peak seasons
Design
SolarGenix
✓ Updated: April 2026 Site ↗
Pricing: Usage-based ($15/design) or Subscription
Key Features
- Generative 3D AI Roof Tracing
- Real-time AHJ Fire-Code Mapping
- Automated Bill-of-Materials (BOM) Generation
- 99.2% Shading Accuracy Guarantee
- Instant Multi-Product Inverter Stringing
Pros
- Fastest design-to-contract time in the 2026 market
- Eliminates the cost of an internal design department for Stage 1-2 teams
- Native interface for field site-survey uploads
Cons
- AI can occasionally struggle with complex non-standard commercial architectural features
- Relies on the latest high-res satellite imagery availability
Our Verdict
Choose Solargraf if...
- ✓Your team is at Stage 2 maturity.
- ✓You prioritize Integrated EPC Sales Engine.
- ✓You need a stable, verified integration for Californian NEM 3.0 workflows.
Choose SolarGenix if...
- ✓Your team is at Stage 2 maturity.
- ✓You prioritize Generative AI Design.
- ✓You are looking for an integrated "All-in-One" sales ecosystem.
⚡
Still can't decide?
Our Matchmaker Quiz picks the right tool for your specific install volume and business stage.
Take the Matchmaker Quiz ⚡